🔗 Share this article

Iran is willing to resume nuclear discussions with Washington provided that it is approached with "respect" and "honor", Iran's top diplomat has stated.

Abbas Araghchi said only diplomacy worked, and revealed new appeals had originated from go-betweens to resume discussions with the US government. He said Iran had zero undeclared nuclear sites, and Iran had not yet reached a point to permit the UN nuclear inspectorate to visit struck enrichment centers for security reasons.

Navigating a Challenging Route

Araghchi is walking a difficult path since Iran wishes not to appear to be acting from a situation of vulnerability, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had emerged more resilient in military terms and mentally from the Israeli-US attack on its enrichment centers in June.

He was speaking at a defense forum in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "an inalienable right to process nuclear material on home soil that it will always maintain" – the primary cause of the deadlock in the earlier negotiations.

Earlier Negotiations Suddenly Terminated

The previous five rounds of negotiations between the United States and Iran were ended suddenly and hostile termination on 12 June when Israel, with American backing, targeted Iranian nuclear sites in a two-week conflict that ended with the American leader claiming the locations had been destroyed. Following this, European countries employed their authority to restore global restrictions, but Iran insists they have not had a significant effect.

Magic Solution Suggested

Tehran representatives claimed they felt they had achieved a "ideal resolution" to the enrichment issue in earlier negotiations, when it was decided an local partnership with Washington's engagement could process nuclear material. Both sides would have been able to claim victory since home-based processing would have persisted and the US could be assured that Iran's atomic project was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been decided in the talks that Washington's technical specialists could function inside Iran, but that was a logical implication of the cooperative offer. Officials asserted three times they had secured an understanding with the US representative the American negotiator only for the arrangement to fall apart due to "opponents in the US".

Current Situation

Tehran representatives stated the cooperative arrangement was now off the table, but it seems quite possible the offer could be resurrected in some form if discussions restart.

The US president last week said he had been obtaining communications that Iran desired to resume discussions, but privately Tehran representatives state they are not yet receiving consistent overtures from Washington either directly or from key regional mediators, such as Qatar, the Egyptian leadership, Oman and the Saudi kingdom. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been accused of inactivity in the aftermath of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Tehran asserts negotiations is not part of a performance.

Negotiating Standpoint

In his speech to the conference, aimed to depict the US as a hegemonic power that exploits the notion of international law, the foreign minister said the two-week conflict demonstrated the clash could not be settled by combat operations. He asserted the assaults began with a Washington's ultimatum for an total Iran submission and ended with an unconditional call for a truce.

Iran is certain the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were executed with full US knowledge and collaboration, making confidence hard to reestablish.

Dialogue Continues the Ultimate Solution

Araghchi stated: "It was not Iran that had abandoned negotiations; it was the United States and the European states that had consistently sought to impose their will during the negotiations. Diplomacy can still be active and remains the final answer to resolve conflicts, but its requirements, rules and principles must be followed."

"If they address to the nation of Iran with the approach of dignity and honor, they will get a reply in the same tone."

Recovery and Recovery

In what is described by Iranian officials as the conflict of recovery and rebuilding, Araghchi said he was assured Iran's military capacities "are much stronger than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been rebuilt. We gained multiple understandings from this conflict; we have discovered our internal vulnerabilities and the shortcomings of the enemy."

He continued: "We effectively endured this conflict. Our enrichment knowledge, which they aimed to destroy, stays intact. The sites and gear, if destroyed, will be rebuilt; what is crucial is the will of the Iranian people and then the unity of the country that they targeted, but failed to break. The nation of Iran have developed stronger, more cohesive, and more supportive of the administration and the country in the wake of this attack."